<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>De Koopman &#187; time magazine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dekoopman.net/tag/time-magazine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dekoopman.net</link>
	<description>Nieuws uit, over en rondom internethandelsplaatsen</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 17:27:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Time strÃ¡ft Craigslist om zijn eenvoud</title>
		<link>http://dekoopman.net/2009/08/25/time-straft-craigslist-om-zijn-eenvoud/</link>
		<comments>http://dekoopman.net/2009/08/25/time-straft-craigslist-om-zijn-eenvoud/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 08:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erwin Boogert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internationaal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prikbord]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zoeken]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[craigslist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wedstrijd]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dekoopman.net/?p=2452</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Craigslist staat niet in Times toplijst &#8217;50 Best Websites of 2009&#8242;. Waarom niet? TÃ© retro, tÃ© hippie, tÃ© ascii [?] c.q. Web 0.2. Hoe lezen we Times oordeel over de stoffigheid van Craigslist? Omdat Time wÃ©l de site Craiglook nomineerde als een van de aller, aller, allerbeste sites van het interweb. De motivatie: &#8220;(&#8230;) . [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><center><br />
<img src="http://dekoopman.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/Craiglook_ Craigslist Search.jpg" border="1"/><br />
</center><br />
<strong>Craigslist staat niet in Times toplijst</strong> &#8217;50 Best Websites of 2009&#8242;. Waarom niet? TÃ© retro, tÃ© hippie, tÃ© ascii [<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ASCII">?</a>] c.q. Web 0.2. </p>
<p>Hoe lezen we Times oordeel over de <strong>stoffigheid van Craigslist</strong>? Omdat Time wÃ©l de site <a href="http://www.craiglook.com/">Craiglook</a> nomineerde als <a href="http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1918031_1918016_1917937,00.html">een van de aller, aller, allerbeste sites</a> van het interweb. </p>
<p>De motivatie:</p>
<blockquote><p>
&#8220;<i>(&#8230;) . Craiglook remedies those things by adding all the Web 2.0 bells and whistles we&#8217;ve come to expect to Craig&#8217;s underlying listings data. It&#8217;s not an alternative to Craigslist â€” <strong>it&#8217;s a remix. There are image previews, a slider that controls the search radius and boxes you can check to control search categories. Finally!</strong> (&#8230;)</i>&#8221;
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dekoopman.net/2009/08/25/time-straft-craigslist-om-zijn-eenvoud/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

